Treatment by a specialist surgical neuro-oncologist does not provide any survival advantage for patients with a malignant glioma

Br J Neurosurg. 1998 Feb;12(1):29-32. doi: 10.1080/02688699845474.

Abstract

To determine whether patients with malignant glioma (glioblastoma and anaplastic astrocytoma) had longer survival times, and lower morbidity and mortality if operated on by a surgical neuro-oncologist rather than a general neurosurgeon the outcomes of 236 patients managed within a university surgical neurology department were analysed. Although both surgical morbidity (8.9 versus 11.8%) and mortality (3.6 versus 8.8%) were lower following surgery by the specialist neuro-oncologist neither difference was statistically significant. Crude outcome data suggested patients operated upon by a specialist surgical neuro-oncologist survived longer (p = 0.067). However, after adjustment for case mix (type of tumour, year of treatment, MRC prognostic index) using multiple logistic regression and a hazards model, there was no difference in outcome (p = 0.46, HR 0.884, 95% CI 0.639-1.22). This retrospective study (i) suggests that other outcome measures are required to validate specialist surgical neuro-oncologist treatment of patients with malignant glioma; and (ii) confirms the importance of adjustment for case mix when comparing non-randomized treatment outcomes.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Astrocytoma / mortality
  • Astrocytoma / surgery*
  • Brain Neoplasms / mortality
  • Brain Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Clinical Competence
  • Glioblastoma / mortality
  • Glioblastoma / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Neurosurgery*
  • Patient Care Team*
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Scotland
  • Specialization*
  • Survival Analysis