Quality improvement in cardiac care

Arch Surg. 2002 Jan;137(1):28-36. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.1.28.

Abstract

Quality improvement in cardiac care has made considerable progress over the past 30 years. During that period, there has been the development of multi-institutional databases to monitor outcomes following cardiothoracic surgery. These databases initially began using only volume and unadjusted operative (30-day) mortality as outcome criteria. There has been a progressive increase in their sophistication, with the building of risk models based on preoperative variables, which accurately predict the risk of adverse outcomes. Other outcomes have been added including risk-adjusted mortality and morbidity; efficiency outcomes such as length of stay, quality of life, functional health status, neuropsychological outcomes; and long-term outcomes.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study

MeSH terms

  • Cardiac Surgical Procedures / standards*
  • Coronary Artery Bypass / mortality
  • Databases, Factual
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation / mortality
  • Hospitals, Veterans / standards*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Postoperative Complications / mortality
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care*
  • Risk Assessment
  • Surgery Department, Hospital / standards
  • United States / epidemiology
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs