Abstract
We propose an emergency department (ED) pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol based on pretest probability assessment coupled with either a negative D -dimer assay result or a negative D -dimer assay result plus a normal alveolar dead-space measurement. We examine the safety, efficiency, and feasibility of such a protocol, paying special attention to implicit and explicit strategies of pretest probability assessment among patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Finally, we assess the potential effect of the proposed pulmonary embolism rule-out protocol on use of imaging resources and ED throughput.
Publication types
-
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
-
Review
MeSH terms
-
Algorithms
-
Clinical Protocols / standards
-
Decision Trees
-
Diagnosis, Differential
-
Efficiency
-
Emergency Treatment / methods*
-
Emergency Treatment / standards
-
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay / standards
-
Erythrocyte Aggregation
-
Evidence-Based Medicine
-
Feasibility Studies
-
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products / metabolism*
-
Humans
-
Immunoassay / standards
-
Latex Fixation Tests / standards
-
Length of Stay
-
Point-of-Care Systems / standards
-
Pulmonary Alveoli*
-
Pulmonary Embolism / blood
-
Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
-
Pulmonary Embolism / etiology
-
Respiratory Dead Space*
-
Risk Assessment
-
Risk Factors
-
Safety
-
Sensitivity and Specificity
-
Severity of Illness Index
-
Time Factors
Substances
-
Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
-
fibrin fragment D