A strategy for improving comparability across sites for ligand binding assays measuring therapeutic proteins

Abstract

Outsourcing and multi-site testing has increased for ligand binding assays supporting protein therapeutic measurement. It is common to combine and compare data across studies with data from multiple bioanalytical sites. We designed a prospective study to determine the benefits of increasing control over the transfer process to improve ruggedness. The experiment involved the testing of 30 incurred samples at 3 stages with incremental laboratory harmonization in standard/quality controls and assay components: Stage I represented a transfer of a detailed protocol and critical reagents. Stage II, a single source of standards and quality controls were provided to each site. Stage III, standards and quality controls plus a ready-to-use kit were provided. The results indicated that all testing facilities failed agreement testing using the stage I procedure. The introduction of standards from a single source improved the agreement. The modification reduced variation by 33% compared to the stage I approach. There was no additional benefit when a packaged kit was provided. In conclusion, introduction of a single source of standards and quality controls reduced the inter-site component of variation and should allow for combinability of data.