Costs of different follow-up strategies in early breast cancer: a review of the literature

Breast. 2012 Dec;21(6):693-700. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.09.009. Epub 2012 Oct 22.

Abstract

We reviewed the literature between January 1985 and June 2011 on the costs of different follow-up strategies for patients treated for early breast cancer. A total of 186 abstracts were retrieved of which eleven publications were considered relevant; 6 randomised clinical trials, 4 retrospective cohort studies and 1 'minisymposium'. The follow-up strategies, outcome measures and methods of analysis used in these studies vary widely, so no general conclusions can be drawn. However, from the results we infer that patient-led follow-up by a nurse practitioner, follow-up by a general practitioner, or telephone follow-up is feasible and cost-effective, without routine additional tests, except annual mammograms. In this era of increasing health care costs, cost-effectiveness, evaluated in a standardised way, should be taken into account in future clinical trials.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Australia
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Breast Neoplasms / economics
  • Breast Neoplasms / pathology
  • Breast Neoplasms / therapy
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Europe
  • Female
  • Health Care Costs*
  • Humans
  • Mammography / economics
  • Neoplasm Metastasis / diagnosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / diagnosis
  • Neoplasm Recurrence, Local / economics
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Population Surveillance / methods*
  • Telemedicine / economics
  • United States