Big Data Research in Pediatric Neurosurgery: Content, Statistical Output, and Bibliometric Analysis

Pediatr Neurosurg. 2019;54(2):85-97. doi: 10.1159/000495790. Epub 2019 Feb 20.

Abstract

Background/aims: We sought to describe pediatric "big data" publications since 2000, their statistical output, and clinical implications.

Methods: We searched 4 major North American neurosurgical journals for articles utilizing non-neurosurgery-specific databases for clinical pediatric neurosurgery research. Articles were analyzed for descriptive and statistical information. We analyzed effect sizes (ESs), confidence intervals (CIs), and p values for clinical relevance. A bibliometric analysis was performed using several key citation metrics.

Results: We identified 74 articles, which constituted 1.7% of all pediatric articles (n = 4,436) published, with an exponential increase after 2013 (53/74, 72%). The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) databases were most frequently utilized (n = 33); hydrocephalus (n = 19) was the most common study topic. The statistical output (n = 49 studies with 464 ESs, 456 CIs, and 389 p values) demonstrated that the majority of the ESs (253/464, 55%) were categorized as small; half or more of the CI spread (CIS) values and p values were high (274/456, 60%) and very strong (195/389, 50%), respectively. Associations with a combination of medium-to-large ESs (i.e., magnitude of difference), medium-to-high CISs (i.e., precision), and strong-to-very strong p values comprised only 20% (75/381) of the reported ESs. The total number of citations for the 74 articles was 1,115 (range per article, 0-129), with the median number of citations per article being 8.5. Four studies had > 50 citations, and 2 of them had > 100 citations. The calculated h-index was 16, h-core citations were 718, the e-index was 21.5, and the Google i10-index was 34.

Conclusions: There has been a dramatic increase in the use of "big data" in the pediatric neurosurgical literature. Reported associations that may, as a group, be of greatest interest to practitioners represented only 20% of the total output from these publications. Citations were weighted towards a few highly cited publications.

Keywords: Administrative databases; Big data; Outcomes; Pediatric neurosurgery.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Bibliometrics*
  • Big Data*
  • Child
  • Humans
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Neurosurgical Procedures / trends
  • Pediatrics / statistics & numerical data*
  • Pediatrics / trends
  • Periodicals as Topic / statistics & numerical data
  • Periodicals as Topic / trends