Why Do Candidates Forgo Cochlear Implantation?

Laryngoscope. 2023 Dec;133(12):3548-3553. doi: 10.1002/lary.30721. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

Abstract

Objective: Identify barriers and facilitating factors in cochlear implant (CI) utilization by comparing functional measures between CI candidates who undergo or forgo implantation.

Methods: Forty-three participants were separated into two groups: (1) 28 participants who underwent CI and (2) 15 participants who elected not to proceed with CI despite meeting eligibility criteria (no-CI). Prior to implantation, all participants completed the CI Quality of Life (CIQOL)-35 Profile and CIQOL-Expectations instrument. They were also surveyed on factors contributing to their decision to either undergo or forgo CI. Word and speech recognition were determined using the Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) and the AzBio tests, respectively.

Results: CIQOL-Expectations scores were indistinguishable between groups, but there were substantial differences in baseline CIQOL-35 Profile scores. Compared to the CI group, the no-CI group exhibited higher pre-CI scores in the Emotional (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) and Entertainment (Cohen's d [95% CI] = 0.8 [0.1, 1.5]) domains. Survey data revealed that the most commonly reported barriers to pursuing CI in the no-CI cohort were fear of surgical complications (85%), cost associated with implantation (85%), and perception that hearing was not poor enough for CI surgery (85%).

Conclusions and relevance: The results of this study indicate that functional outcome expectations are similar between candidates who elect to receive or forgo CI, yet those who forgo CI have higher baseline CI-specific QOL abilities.

Level of evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 133:3548-3553, 2023.

Keywords: cochlear implant; hearing loss; quality of life.

MeSH terms

  • Cochlear Implantation* / methods
  • Cochlear Implants*
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural* / surgery
  • Humans
  • Quality of Life
  • Speech Perception*
  • Treatment Outcome