Introduction: We evaluated the necessity of obtaining routine postoperative laboratory studies, such as complete blood count and basic metabolic panel, after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy.
Methods: This study is a retrospective review of 200 robotic assisted radical prostatectomy cases performed over a year and a half at our institution. The incidences of laboratory abnormalities were examined along with any clinical intervention. Patient demographics, tumor stage, Gleason score, operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, presence of comorbidities and postoperative laboratory studies were extracted from the electronic medical record. The costs of laboratory studies were tabulated to further analyze potential savings to patients.
Results: Only 15 (7.5%) patients demonstrated laboratory abnormalities that required medical intervention. Of these 15 patients, all demonstrated hypokalemia that was treated with potassium supplementation. Patients with longer lengths of stay demonstrated higher percentages of medical intervention. The costs of these laboratory studies were calculated at $8,840.
Conclusions: Lower blood loss and transfusion rates with the advent of robotic assisted radical prostatectomy along with the results described in this study provide greater evidence that postoperative laboratory studies may be futile. By eliminating these laboratory studies, substantial cost savings are realized if extrapolated across the United States. This study is limited in its evaluation of complications from different types of medical centers, higher risk patients, postoperative laboratory studies impact on symptomatic patients, and absence of emergency room visits or hospital readmissions.
Keywords: prostatectomy; robotics.