Aims: The relationship between the level of baseline risk factor control and cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with blood pressure interventions is not well understood. It is also unclear whether the level of baseline risk factor control is persuasively associated with cardiovascular outcomes in hypertensive patients with a blood pressure lowering strategy.
Method and results: We performed an analysis of the Strategy of Blood Pressure Intervention in the Elderly Hypertensive Patients (STEP) trial. Participants without complete baseline risk factor data were excluded. The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Cox proportional hazard models were used to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and estimate the association between risk factor control levels (≥6, 5, 4, and ≤3) and cardiovascular outcomes. A total of 8337 participants were involved in the analysis, and the median follow-up period was 3.19 years. Each additional risk factor uncontrolled was associated with a 24% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.24, 95% CI 1.11-1.37). Compared with participants with optimal risk factor control, those with ≤3 factors control exhibited 95% higher cardiovascular risk (HR 1.95, 95% CI 1.37-2.77). The corresponding protective effects of multiple risk factor modification were not influenced by intensive or standard antihypertensive treatment (P for interaction = 0.71).
Conclusion: A stepwise association was observed between cardiovascular risk and the number of risk factor control in hypertensive patients. The more risk factors were modified, the less cardiovascular risk was observed, irrespective of different blood pressure lowering strategies. Comprehensive risk factor control strategies are warranted to reduce cardiovascular disease risk in hypertensive patients.
Keywords: Cardiovascular risk factors; Hypertension; Intensive blood pressure lowering.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.