The choice of path to resilience is crucial to the future of production forests
Nat Ecol Evol
.
2024 Sep;8(9):1561-1563.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-024-02473-x.
Authors
Adam Felton
1
,
Rupert Seidl
2
3
,
David B Lindenmayer
4
,
Christian Messier
5
6
,
Magnus Löf
7
,
Johannes H C de Koning
8
,
Thomas Ranius
9
,
Michelle Cleary
7
,
Per-Ola Hedwall
7
,
María Trinidad Torres García
7
,
Annika M Felton
7
Affiliations
1
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden. adam.felton@slu.se.
2
TUM School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
3
Berchtesgaden National Park, Berchtesgaden, Germany.
4
The Fenner School of Environment and Society, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
5
Department of Biological Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
6
Institut des Sciences de la Forêt Tempérée (ISFORT), Université du Québec en Outaouais (UQO), Gatineau, Quebec, Canada.
7
Southern Swedish Forest Research Centre, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.
8
Copenhagen University, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, Frederiksberg C, Denmark.
9
Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
PMID:
38997461
DOI:
10.1038/s41559-024-02473-x
No abstract available
MeSH terms
Conservation of Natural Resources*
Forestry
Forests*
Grants and funding
2019-02007/Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas)
2022-02070/Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas)
2022-02075/Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas (Swedish Research Council Formas)
101001905/EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020)