Differences in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction management between care providers: an international survey

Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Feb;27(2):198-208. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3416. Epub 2024 Aug 21.

Abstract

Aims: Heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is characterized by growing incidence and poor outcomes. A large majority of HFpEF patients are cared by non-cardiologists. The availability of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) as recommended therapy raises the importance of prompt and accurate identification and treatment of HFpEF across diverse healthcare settings. We evaluated HFpEF management across specialties through a survey targeting cardiologists, HF specialists, and non-cardiologists.

Methods and results: An independent web-based survey was distributed globally between May and July 2023. We performed a post-hoc analysis, comparing cardiologists, HF specialists, and non-cardiologists. A total of 1460 physicians (61% male, median age 41[34-49]) from 95 countries completed the survey; 20% were HF specialists, 65% cardiologists, and 15% non-cardiologists. Compared with HF specialists, non-cardiologists and cardiologists were less likely to use natriuretic peptides (p = 0.003) and HFpEF scores (p = 0.004) for diagnosis, and were also less likely to have access to or consider specific echocardiographic parameters (p < 0.001) for identifying HFpEF. Diastolic stress tests were used in less than 30% of the cases, regardless of the specialty (p = 1.12). Multidrug treatment strategies were similar across different specialties. While SGLT2i and diuretics were the preferred drugs, angiotensin receptor blockers and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors were the least frequently prescribed in all three groups. However, when constrained to choose one drug, the proportion of physicians favoring SGLT2i varied significantly among specialties (66% HF specialists, 52% cardiologists, 51% non-cardiologists). Additionally, 10% of non-cardiologists and 8% of cardiologists considered beta blocker the drug of choice for HFpEF.

Conclusion: Significant differences among specialty groups were observed in HFpEF management, particularly in the diagnostic work-up. Our results highlight a substantial risk of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of HFpEF patients, especially among non-HF specialists.

Keywords: Heart failure; Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; Management improvement; SGLT2 inhibitors; Survey.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cardiologists* / statistics & numerical data
  • Disease Management*
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / drug therapy
  • Heart Failure* / physiopathology
  • Heart Failure* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'* / statistics & numerical data
  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors* / therapeutic use
  • Stroke Volume* / physiology
  • Surveys and Questionnaires

Substances

  • Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors