Background: Arterial blood gas (ABG) analysis is a critical component of patient management in intensive care units (ICUs), operating rooms, and general wards, providing essential information on acid-base balance, oxygenation, and metabolic status. Interpretation requires a high level of expertise, potentially leading to variability in accuracy. This study explores the feasibility and accuracy of ChatGPT-4, an AI-based model, in interpreting ABG results compared to experienced anesthesiologists.
Methods: This prospective observational study, approved by the institutional ethics board, included 400 ABG samples from ICU patients, anonymized and assessed by ChatGPT-4. The model analyzed parameters including acid-base status, oxygenation, hemoglobin levels, and metabolic markers, and provided both diagnostic and treatment recommendations. Two anesthesiologists, trained in ABG interpretation, independently evaluated the model's predictions to determine accuracy in potential diagnoses and treatment.
Results: ChatGPT-4 achieved high accuracy across most ABG parameters, with 100 % accuracy for pH, oxygenation, sodium, and chloride. Hemoglobin accuracy was 92.5 %, while bilirubin interpretation showed limitations at 72.5 %. In several cases, the model recommended unnecessary bicarbonate treatment, suggesting an area for improvement in clinical judgment for acid-base balance management. The model's overall performance was statistically significant across most parameters (p < 0.05).
Discussion: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated potential as a supplementary tool for ABG interpretation in high-demand clinical settings, supporting rapid, reliable decision-making. However, the model's limitations in interpreting complex metabolic markers highlight the need for clinician oversight. Future refinements should focus on enhancing AI training for nuanced metabolic interpretation, particularly for markers like bilirubin, to ensure safe and effective application across diverse clinical contexts.
Keywords: Acid-base imbalance; Arterial blood gas analysis; Artificial intelligence; Clinical decision support; Oxygenation.
Copyright © 2025 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.