The impact of self-isolation on psychological wellbeing in adults and how to reduce it: A systematic review

PLoS One. 2025 Mar 28;20(3):e0310851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310851. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Objective: To synthesise evidence on the impact of self-isolation at home on the psychological and emotional wellbeing of adults in the general population during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022378140). We searched Medline, PsycINFO, Web of Science, Embase, and grey literature. Wellbeing included adverse mental health outcomes and adaptive wellbeing. We followed PRISMA and synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) guidelines. We extracted data on the impact of self-isolation on wellbeing, and factors associated with and interventions targeting wellbeing during self-isolation.

Results: Thirty-six studies were included. The mode quality rating was 'high-risk'. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were most investigated. Evidence for an impact of self-isolation on wellbeing was often inconsistent in quantitative studies, although qualitative studies consistently reported a negative impact. People with pre-existing mental and physical health needs reported increased symptoms of mental ill health during self-isolation. Studies reported modifiable stressors that have been reported in previous infectious disease contexts, such as inadequate support, poor coping strategies, inadequate and conflicting information, and highlighted the importance of regular contact from trusted healthcare professionals. Interventions targeting psychological wellbeing were rare and evaluative studies of these had high or very high risk of bias.

Conclusion: When implementing self-isolation directives, public health officials should prioritise support for individuals who have pre-existing mental or physical health needs, lack support, or who are facing significant life stressors. Focus should be directed toward interventions that address loneliness, worries, and misinformation, whilst monitoring and identifying individuals in need of additional support.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adaptation, Psychological
  • Adult
  • Anxiety / psychology
  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • COVID-19* / psychology
  • Depression / psychology
  • Humans
  • Mental Health*
  • Pandemics
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Social Isolation* / psychology

Grants and funding

This study was funded by the Research England Policy Support Fund 2022-23 (from the allocation to King’s College London). The funders had no role in the study design, the collection, analysis and interpretation of data, in the writing of the article, or in the decision to submit it for publication. AFM, LES, SKB, RA and GJR are supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research Health Protection Research Unit (NIHR HPRU) in Emergency Preparedness and Response, a partnership between the UK Health Security Agency, King’s College London and the University of East Anglia. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR, UKHSA or the Department of Health and Social Care. For the purpose of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence to any Author Accepted Manuscript version arising.