Comprehensive Analysis of the Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan According to Sex Among Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction in PARADIGM-HF

J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038249. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038249. Epub 2025 Apr 23.

Abstract

Background: Women with heart failure (HF) ejection fraction appeared to respond more favorably to sacubitril/valsartan, compared with valsartan, than men in PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ARB Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction), driven by a greater reduction in total (first and recurrent) HF hospitalizations. Sex-specific efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in PARADIGM-HF (Prospective Comparison of ARNI With ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure) remain unreported.

Methods and results: This post hoc analysis of PARADIGM-HF examined sex-based outcomes in patients with HF and reduced ejection fraction randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or enalapril. The primary end point was a composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. Secondary and exploratory efficacy outcomes, biomarker changes, and safety outcomes were also assessed. Among 8399 participants, 1832 (21.8%) were women. Women were older, had worse New York Heart Association functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores, more symptoms of HF, and lower estimated glomerular filtration rate, yet had lower rates of HF hospitalization (and other worsening of HF) and cardiovascular death than men. Compared with enalapril, sacubitril/valsartan reduced the risk of the primary end point to a similar extent in both sexes: hazard ratios, 0.76 (95% CI, 0.62-0.94) in women and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.73-0.89) in men (P-interaction=0.62). Results were consistent for the individual components of the primary outcome. The rate ratio for total HF hospitalizations was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.48-0.89) in women and 0.80 (95% CI, 0.69-0.94) in men (P-interaction=0.25). Randomized treatment discontinuation and adverse effects of interest were similar in women and men.

Conclusions: In PARADIGM-HF, sacubitril/valsartan, compared with enalapril, reduced the risk of HF hospitalizations, death from cardiovascular causes, and death from any cause similarly in women and men with HF with reduced ejection fraction. In addition, sacubitril/valsartan was safe and well tolerated, irrespective of sex.

Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT01035255.

Keywords: heart failure hospitalization; heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF); prognosis; sacubitril/valsartan; sex differences; treatment effect.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Comparative Study
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aminobutyrates* / adverse effects
  • Aminobutyrates* / therapeutic use
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists* / adverse effects
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists* / therapeutic use
  • Biphenyl Compounds / therapeutic use
  • Drug Combinations
  • Enalapril / therapeutic use
  • Female
  • Heart Failure* / diagnosis
  • Heart Failure* / drug therapy
  • Heart Failure* / mortality
  • Heart Failure* / physiopathology
  • Hospitalization / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Sex Factors
  • Stroke Volume* / drug effects
  • Tetrazoles* / adverse effects
  • Tetrazoles* / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Valsartan* / adverse effects
  • Valsartan* / therapeutic use
  • Ventricular Function, Left* / drug effects

Substances

  • Aminobutyrates
  • Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists
  • Biphenyl Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Enalapril
  • sacubitril and valsartan sodium hydrate drug combination
  • Tetrazoles
  • Valsartan

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT01035255