Background: Aortic annuloplasty, involving the implantation of an external ring around the aortic root to reduce annular dimensions, is a promising treatment for aortic valve insufficiency. However, its hemodynamic effects remain underexplored due to the absence of computational models validated by experimental and clinical data.
Methods: This study introduces a computational fluid-structure interaction (FSI) model of supra valvular aortic annuloplasty using 4D-flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Native and post-annuloplasty conditions of idealized aortic root phantoms, including the aortic valve, were CAD-modelled and 3D-printed with elastic resin. These phantoms were tested in a mock circulatory flow-loop providing normal pulsatile physiologic conditions using a glycerol-water mixture to simulate blood viscosity. Flow and pressure data collected from sensors were used as boundary conditions for FSI simulations. Experimental velocity fields from 4D-flow MRI were compared to computational results to assess model accuracy.
Results: MRI scans of the annuloplasty model showed an increased peak systolic velocity (up to 145.4 cm/s) and localized flow alterations, corresponding to a higher pressure gradient across the valve. During regurgitation, the annuloplasty model showed broader velocity distributions compared to the native condition. The FSI simulations closely matched 4D-flow MRI data, with strong correlation coefficients (r > 0.93) and minimal Bland-Altman differences, particularly during systolic phases.
Conclusions: This study establishes an integrative methodology combining in-vitro, in-silico, and clinical imaging techniques to evaluate aortic annuloplasty hemodynamics. The in-vitro validated digital twin framework offers a pathway for patient-specific modelling, enabling prediction of surgical outcomes and optimization of aortic valve repair strategies.
Keywords: 4D-flow MRI; Aortic annuloplasty; Digital twin; FSI simulation; Flow-loop; Personalized medicine.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.