Background: Centrifuge-free processing methods support stool Xpert Ultra testing for childhood tuberculosis (TB), but there are limited data on their accuracy, acceptability and usability.
Methods: We conducted a prospective evaluation of stool Xpert Ultra in India, South Africa, and Uganda with three methods: Stool Processing Kit (SPK), Simple One-Step (SOS), and Optimized Sucrose Flotation (OSF). Children <15 years old with presumptive TB had sputum testing with Xpert Ultra and culture. We compared the accuracy of each method to a microbiological reference standard (MRS, TB if Xpert Ultra or culture positive) and a composite reference standard (CRS, TB if Confirmed or Unconfirmed TB). We surveyed laboratory staff to assess acceptability and usability of the methods.
Results: We included 607 children, with a median age of 3.5 years (IQR 1.3-7) and 15.5% HIV positive. Against the MRS, the sensitivities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 36.9% (95% CI 28.6-45.8), 38.6% (95% CI 17.2-51.0), and 31.3% (95% CI 20.2-44.1), respectively. The specificities of SPK, SOS and OSF were 98.2% (95% CI 96.4-99.3), 97.3% (95% CI 93.7-99.1), and 97.1% (95% CI 93.3-99), respectively. The methods were acceptable and usable, but SOS was reported as most feasible to implement in a peripheral facility. Across methods, sensitivity increased among children who were culture-positive (55.0-77.3%) and was low (13-16.7%) against the CRS. Adding stool Xpert Ultra increased sensitivity 0% (OSF) to 11.8% (SPK/SOS) over sputum alone.
Conclusions: Stool processing methods for Xpert Ultra were acceptable, usable, and performed similarly, with highest sensitivity among children with culture-positive TB.
Keywords: Xpert Ultra; centrifuge-free; child; diagnostics; stool; tuberculosis.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.