Background: Prior research on the mental well-being of adolescents has shown conflicting findings regarding the impact of only-child status. This study uses Propensity Score Matching (PSM) to control for confounding variables and investigate the impact of only-child status on the psychological health of adolescents.
Methods: A multi-center cluster sampling approach included 7,359 students from 33 middle schools in Western China. The Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21), the Childhood Psychological Abuse and Neglect Scale (CPANS), the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), the Chinese iteration of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS-11), and the Chinese version of the Positive and Negative Affect Scale for Children (PANAS-C) were utilized to assess the adolescents' emotions, sleep, psychological abuse, and neglect. PSM was employed to address confounding variables. Univariate analysis used t-tests, chi-square tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, while multivariate analysis used GLM to compare DASS-21, PSQI, and PANAS-C scores.
Results: After PSM, 980 only-child and 980 non-only-child adolescents were included. Only-child adolescents showed significantly lower levels of depression, stress, emotional neglect, and negative affect. Further scrutiny of the mean ranks of these dimensions indicated that the only-child group yielded lower scores. In the GLM analysis, after adjusting for neglect, no significant associations were observed (all p > 0.05). However, post adjustments for psychological abuse, the only-child group also recorded lower scores in depression, stress, and negative affect.
Conclusions: This study reveals that the only-child adolescents possibly showing better psychological well-being overall in western China. This study's findings suggest that, during adolescent development, families and society should pay greater attention to the mental health of non-only children.
Keywords: Adolescents; Depressive disorder; Mental health; Only child; Propensity score.
© 2025. The Author(s).