Introduction: Intra-abdominal candidiasis (IAC) is a serious complication in critically ill patients, particularly after abdominal surgery or trauma. Differentiating Candida colonization from invasive infection is crucial, as misdiagnosis can lead to inappropriate antifungal use, increased resistance, and worse outcomes. However, IAC remains underrecognized due to the limitations of conventional culture-based diagnostics. Relevant literature was identified through a non-systematic search of the PubMed database.
Areas covered: This review highlights the challenges in diagnosing and managing IAC, focusing on the limitations of traditional culture methods and the potential of non-culture-based diagnostics. Biomarkers such as 1-3-β-D-glucan (BDG) and Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA), along with molecular assays, improve diagnostic accuracy but have varying sensitivity and specificity, requiring a multimodal approach. Management involves early diagnosis, source control, and targeted antifungal therapy. Current guidelines, largely based on candidemia, recommend echinocandins as first-line therapy, with fluconazole for stable patients and amphotericin B for resistant strains.
Expert opinion: Despite advances, IAC-specific research is lacking, necessitating improved diagnostic tools and tailored therapies. There is a need for more targeted studies to refine diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic strategies. Future efforts should focus on developing rapid, high-sensitivity and specific diagnostic tools, optimizing antifungal stewardship, and individualizing treatment approaches.
Keywords: 1-3-β-D-glucan (BDG); Candida abdominal infection; Candida albicans germ tube antibody (CAGTA); Candida colonization; Intra-abdominal candidiasis; T2Candida panel; antifungal therapy; deep-seated candidiasis; diagnosis; invasive candidiasis.