Background: Exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance (ExCMR) imaging using supine in-scanner ergometer has shown promise in differentiating pathological dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) from physiological exercise-induced cardiac remodeling. Since 2020, the National Heart Centre Singapore (NHCS) has incorporated ExCMR into its clinical workflow for patients with suspected DCM. This study aims to compare the costs associated with ExCMR versus conventional CMR in the evaluation of DCM.
Method: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients referred for conventional CMR between 2016 and 2019, and those referred for ExCMR from 2020 to 2023. Both imaging modalities followed standardized protocols, with ExCMR incorporating additional assessments during peak exercise. Costs were recorded in Singapore dollars (SGD) prior to the application of healthcare subsidies.
Results: The total cost for conventional CMR was SGD 1,831.36, while ExCMR was associated with a higher initial cost of SGD 2,336.48. However, ExCMR resulted in significantly fewer abnormal imaging findings and a reduced need for follow-up investigations (6.5% vs. 56.8%, p<0.001). A decision tree analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) revealed that diagnosing 1,000 suspected DCM patients with ExCMR could result in a cost savings of approximately SGD 182,323 compared to conventional CMR, with a 64% probability of being cost-effective.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that ExCMR offers a physiologically informative approach for diagnosing DCM, with the potential to reduce over-diagnosis of cardiac dilatation in active, healthy adults. Although further research is necessary to assess long-term outcomes, ExCMR appears to be a cost-effective imaging modality for DCM diagnosis, warranting reconsideration of its perceived higher cost.
Keywords: cost effectiveness; dilated cardiomyopathy; exercise cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.