Trajectories of FEV1 after lung transplantation and patient outcomes

J Heart Lung Transplant. 2025 Jun 24:S1053-2498(25)02036-4. doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2025.06.011. Online ahead of print.

Abstract

Background: The forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) is the standard measure used to monitor the lung function after lung transplantation. However, little is known about the FEV1 trajectories post transplantation, and their associations with clinical outcomes.

Methods: Adult patients who received a bilateral lung transplant between January 1, 2010 and January 1, 2021 were included from 15 centres in France, Belgium, Austria and the US. Three French centres formed the development cohort and the remaining centres formed the external validation cohorts. All centres performed routine spirometry measurements commencing shortly after lung transplantation and continuing at regular intervals of maximum three months afterwards. Recipient, donor and transplant characteristics were collected. Latent class mixed models were used to identify FEV1 trajectories. The number of FEV1 trajectories was defined according to the Akaike Information Criterion, Bayesian Information Criterion, the discrimination, the entropy and the interpretability of the model.

Findings: A total of 2305 patients were included with 59 034 FEV1 measurements collected. The median follow-up post-transplantation was 4.3 years (IQR 2.3-6.2). In the development cohort (n=605), the best latent class mixed model identified seven clinically meaningful FEV1 trajectories. Trajectory #1 (25.6%) was characterized by patients with moderate and stable lung function (3-year patient survival = 79.9%); trajectory #2 (24.0%) and #3 (27.3%) were characterized by patients with moderate/high and stable lung function (3-year patient survival = 96.6% and 95.7% respectively); trajectory #4 (3.8%) was characterized by patients with increasing lung function (3-year patient survival = 69.6%); trajectory #5 (11.7%) was characterized by patients with a slow decline (3-year patient survival = 90.1%); and trajectory #6 (3.0%) and #7 (4.6%) were characterized by patients with accelerated decline (3-year patient survival = 33.3% and 59.5 % respectively). Patients belonging to trajectories were associated with gender (p=0.020) and underlying disease (p=0.004). Similar FEV1 trajectories and patient outcomes were identified in the external validation cohorts on the basis of independent analyses. The trajectories were also confirmed in a series of subpopulations. Last, FEV1 value and slope at 1 year post transplant were strongly associated with FEV1 trajectories, in both the development cohort and the external validation cohorts.

Interpretation: We identified and validated FEV1 trajectories that capture different clinical scenarios associated with post-transplant recipient outcomes. Our results may provide the basis for a trajectory-based risk assessment of lung transplant recipients.

Funding: "Vaincre la mucoviscidose" grant, the association Grégory Lemarchal, ANR grant, PHRC grant, the FP7 collaborative project, IRSRPL grant, the Fondation du Souffle and PLUTO DITCAP grant from Vaincre la Mucoviscidose and Association Grégory Lemarchal.

Keywords: FEV1; Trajectories; Transplantation; lung; outcomes.