Rapid advancements in large multimodal models (LMMs) have significantly enhanced their applications in pathology, particularly in image classification, pathology image description, and whole slide image (WSI) classification. In pathology, WSIs represent gigapixel-scale images composed of thousands of image patches. Therefore, both patch-level and WSI-level evaluations are essential and inherently interconnected for assessing LMM capabilities. In this work, we propose PathBench, which comprises three subsets at both patch and WSI levels, to refine and enhance the validation of LMMs. At the patch-level, evaluations using existing multi-choice Q&A datasets reveal that some LMMs can predict answers without genuine image analysis. To address this, we introduce PatchVQA, a large-scale visual question answering (VQA) dataset containing 5,382 images and 6,335 multiple-choice questions designed with distractor options to prevent shortcut learning. These new questions are rigorously validated by professional pathologists to ensure reliable model assessments. At the WSI-level, current efforts primarily focus on image classification tasks and lack diverse validation datasets for multimodal models. To address this, we generate a detailed WSI report dataset through an innovative approach that integrates detailed patch descriptions generated by foundational models into comprehensive WSI reports. These are then combined with physician-written reports corresponding to TCGA WSIs, resulting in WSICap, a detailed report dataset containing 7,000 samples. Based on WSICap, we further develop a WSI-level VQA dataset, WSIVQA, to serve as a validation set for WSI LMMs. Using these PathBench subsets, we conduct extensive experiments to benchmark the performance of state-of-the-art LMMs at both the patch and WSI levels. The proposed dataset is available at https://github.com/superjamessyx/PathBench.