Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Search Page

Filters

My Custom Filters

Publication date

Text availability

Article attribute

Article type

Additional filters

Article Language

Species

Sex

Age

Other

Search Results

206 results

Filters applied: . Clear all
Results are displayed in a computed author sort order. The Publication Date timeline is not available.
Page 1
Meta-analysis of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator secondary prevention trials. AVID, CASH and CIDS studies. Antiarrhythmics vs Implantable Defibrillator study. Cardiac Arrest Study Hamburg . Canadian Implantable Defibrillator Study.
Connolly SJ, Hallstrom AP, Cappato R, Schron EB, Kuck KH, Zipes DP, Greene HL, Boczor S, Domanski M, Follmann D, Gent M, Roberts RS. Connolly SJ, et al. Among authors: hallstrom ap. Eur Heart J. 2000 Dec;21(24):2071-8. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2000.2476. Eur Heart J. 2000. PMID: 11102258
Relative effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and antiarrhythmic drugs in patients with varying degrees of left ventricular dysfunction who have survived malignant ventricular arrhythmias. AVID Investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators.
Domanski MJ, Sakseena S, Epstein AE, Hallstrom AP, Brodsky MA, Kim S, Lancaster S, Schron E. Domanski MJ, et al. Among authors: hallstrom ap. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999 Oct;34(4):1090-5. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00327-7. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999. PMID: 10520795 Free article. Clinical Trial.
Outcomes of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator use in patients with comorbidities: results from a combined analysis of 4 randomized clinical trials.
Steinberg BA, Al-Khatib SM, Edwards R, Han J, Bardy GH, Bigger JT, Buxton AE, Moss AJ, Lee KL, Steinman R, Dorian P, Hallstrom A, Cappato R, Kadish AH, Kudenchuk PJ, Mark DB, Inoue LY, Sanders GD. Steinberg BA, et al. JACC Heart Fail. 2014 Dec;2(6):623-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2014.06.007. Epub 2014 Oct 8. JACC Heart Fail. 2014. PMID: 25306452 Free PMC article.
The end-of-study patient survey: methods influencing response rate in the AVID Trial.
Renfroe EG, Heywood G, Foreman L, Schron E, Powell J, Baessler C, Warwick D, Morris M, Hallstrom A; AVID Coordinators and Investigators. Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators. Renfroe EG, et al. Control Clin Trials. 2002 Oct;23(5):521-33. doi: 10.1016/s0197-2456(02)00225-8. Control Clin Trials. 2002. PMID: 12392866 Clinical Trial.
Effect of surgical revascularization in patients with coronary artery disease and ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation in the Antiarrhythmics Versus Implantable Defibrillators (AVID) Registry.
Cook JR, Rizo-Patron C, Curtis AB, Gillis AM, Bigger JT Jr, Kutalek SP, Coromilas J, Hofer BI, Powell J, Hallstrom AP; AVD Investigators. Cook JR, et al. Among authors: hallstrom ap. Am Heart J. 2002 May;143(5):821-6. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2002.121732. Am Heart J. 2002. PMID: 12040343
206 results